Hi, I'm Nicola the Website Manager at GAAPweb. You haven't heard from me on this blog before but I've finally been enticed into writing because of an issue that has been raised for the umpteenth time in our office and I'd really like to get your opinion on it.
This is an unusual issue because it affects everyone we deal with, that is both finance professionals and recruitment consultants alike.
The Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 - SI No 2006 / 1031 - came into force on 1 October 2006. Protecting job-seeking candidates from age discrimination is no doubt a worthy cause and one which I whole-heartedly support, or at least, I do in theory.
The problem I have is that the guidelines for advertisers and recruiters are incredibly vague and I looked in vain for some well defined rules to stick to.
Acas' advice is pretty sensible: avoid specifying a number of years' experience, where possible refer to skills that need to have been developed and only mention qualifications if they are essential to the role.
Where do you draw the line?
Organisations have reacted in different ways. There are those that live in fear of the individuals we're warned about that scour the recruitment industry for job descriptions and interviews processes that contravene the rules in some way. On the other hand, some organisations appear to be unconcerned and seem to have made little effort to comply with the new rules.
At GAAPweb our policy is to remove obvious discrimination and specific numbers of years' experience. Then, in May, at the request of some of our clients we took the decision to remove the term "newly qualified" from our site.
What do you think?
I have my own opinion but as a Biology graduate who's worked in media for the last 5 years I don't feel that I'm the authority on this! And that's where you come in...
Recruitment Consultants! Are you afraid of being sued, or is removing useful adjectives such as "dynamic" and "enthusiastic" just taking things too far?
Accountants and others in the finance profession! Do you think "newly qualified" is a legitimate way of describing skill sets only gained through experience or is it in fact discriminatory?
So what are we going to do about it?
Well for a start, we want to settle the debate in our office and ensure we're employing the right editorial policy!
I think there's a distinct possibility that your collective opinion may rule that, certainly in the accounting profession, there are grounds to define what terms may or may not be used. I feel strongly that the focus of the employment equality regulations should be to protect and help people rather than create bland job descriptions that people are afraid to expand upon.
SO TELL US WHAT YOU THINK!