With further news of plans to implement a ‘High Pay Commission’ scheme that restricts excessive rewards, it seems like the end might be near for uncapped and unmodified bonus schemes.
I’m not saying there’s anything greatly wrong with a bonus culture – at its most basic level it’s a financial incentive to improve performance. However, it needs to be monitored in an appropriate way, which it obviously hasn’t been over the past few years. In fact, it’s been grossly neglected.
So who’s accountable for the public outcry when it comes to bonuses? Should it be the ‘fat cat’ banks who hand them out? Or should the FSA bear the brunt of it? Not according to Hector Sants, FSA Chief Executive, who terms the issue a ‘moral’ one rather than a ‘regulatory’ one. He believes that politicians should implement taxation policies rather than point the finger at the FSA.
Guaranteed rolling bonuses that are paid regardless of performance need to be curbed. According to the code of practice, the maximum term that firms should guarantee a bonus for is one year. It makes sense that any remuneration that follows should then be performance-based.
Mr Sants also commented on a ‘general international agreement’ on this issue, but indicated that it was important that the FSA make the first move, which has, in general, been met with praise.
With a question mark still dangling over who should answer to past mistakes, there’s still a certain element of ‘too little, too late’. However, it’s great that the rules are finally in place…they just need to be followed.